AW: [Modeling] AUML diagrams
Bernhard Bauer
bernhard.bauer@informatik.uni-augsburg.de
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:38:40 +0200
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Wagner, G.R. [mailto:G.R.Wagner@tm.tue.nl]
> Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2003 20:35
> An: 'bernhard.bauer@informatik.uni-augsburg.de';
> sehl.mellouli@ift.ulaval.ca
> Cc:
> Betreff: RE: [Modeling] AUML diagrams
>
>
> > > An agent has its beliefs, desires and intentions (this is an agent
> > > structure), if we consider BDI architecture.
> >
> > I tried to point out these agent specifica in my paper on
> > class diagrams allowing the specifier to describe BDI agents.
> > Using wff for the description of the state of an agent.
>
> Bernhard,
>
> using general wffs for specifying the state of an agent
> seems, like the BDI agent concept, very academic and not
> practical.
Agreed, however Mellouli wants to model BDI agents...
>
> Obviously, the beliefs of an agent can be most naturally
> specified by indicating the (agent and object) classes
> which belong to the agent's state structure definition;
> so the agent has beliefs about (other) agents and objects
> of those types. In general, there will be a number of
> (agent and object) classes which form the basis for
> shared beliefs of several agents, but there will be
> also other classes that define private beliefs (in
> AORML they are called "internal object types").
I.e. the beliefs of agent are usual instances of some classes, right?
Best regards,
Bernhard
>
> -Gerd
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Gerd Wagner
> http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/gwagner/
> Dep. Information & Technology
> Eindhoven University of Technology
> Email: G.Wagner@tm.tue.nl
> Phone: (+31 40) 247 26 17
> Fax: (+31 40) 247 26 12
>
>
>