[Modeling] Modeling an Agent Class- register your opinion

[Dr. Hong Zhu]

HI, Jim and All,

> On 6/20/03 4:09 AM, "Dr. Hong Zhu" indited:
>
> > I am slightly in favour of "cour UML + Agents'. This is mostly from an
> > academic point of view. However, I would not objection to the other
> > approach. It is hard to weight the pros and cons of the approaches.
>
> OK, so what would you recommend removing from UML 2.0 to reach this core?
>

Here are some rough ideas in the form what should stay in the core.
(1) Classes (of objects) are to be static classifications of objects;
(2) Classes are to be single classifications of objects;
(3) Objects are all passive.
Are these acceptable? Please also add to this list for what you think a core
OO model should have.

-Hong

> -Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modeling mailing list
> Modeling@www.fipa.org
> http://fipa.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling