[Modeling] interaction diagrams

[Radovan Cervenka]

> Radovan, I think you missed the point. That document, as I understood, is
> not suposed to be the final but rather the start stone for our
> modifications, this is probably why it looks like so much to UML 2.0.
>
> Jim, correct me if I'm wrong!


Renato, Jim, and others,

I know that Interaction Diagrams document is not the final version. I just
wanted to identify some important facts: it is >95% UML 2.0,
inappropriateness of building UML profile at this stage, naming coincidences
with UML, and idea of using Collaborations.

BTW By solving the UN-SC problem, I think also about multiobjects in more
details. Probably in next few days I come up with some ideas about handling
of multiobjects, identification/adding/deleting of particular objects or set
of objects from multiobjects, multicast messages, specific "dynamic"
dependencies between lifelines, etc. ... all in the sequence diagrams.

Regards,

Rado1.
--
Radovan Cervenka | rce@whitestein.com
Whitestein Technologies | www.whitestein.com
Panenska 28 | SK-81103 Bratislava | Slovak Republic
Tel +421(2)5443-5502 | Fax +421(2)5443-5512
--
If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
you are not authorized to make any use of it;
please delete it and notify us by return email.
Thank you.