FOUNDATION FOR INTELLIGENT
PHYSICAL AGENTS
FIPA Disconfirm Communicative Act Specification
Document title |
FIPA Disconfirm Communicative Act Specification |
||
Document number |
DC00044A |
Document source |
FIPA TC C |
Document status |
Deprecated |
Date of this status |
2000/10/16 |
Supersedes |
None |
||
Contact |
fab@fipa.org |
||
Change history |
|||
2000/10/16 |
Deprecated by FIPA00037 |
© 2000 Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents - http://www.fipa.org/
Geneva, Switzerland
Notice |
Use of the technologies described in this specification may infringe
patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights of FIPA Members and
non-members. Nothing in this specification should be construed as granting
permission to use any of the technologies described. Anyone planning to make
use of technology covered by the intellectual property rights of others
should first obtain permission from the holder(s) of the rights. FIPA
strongly encourages anyone implementing
any part of this specification to determine first whether part(s)
sought to be implemented are covered by the intellectual property of others,
and, if so, to obtain appropriate licenses or other permission from the
holder(s) of such intellectual property prior to implementation. This
specification is subject to change without notice. Neither FIPA nor any of
its Members accept any responsibility whatsoever for damages or liability,
direct or consequential, which may result from the use of this specification. |
Foreword
The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
(FIPA) is an international organization that is dedicated to promoting the
industry of intelligent agents by openly developing specifications supporting
interoperability among agents and agent-based applications. This occurs through
open collaboration among its member organizations, which are companies and
universities that are active in the field of agents. FIPA makes the results of
its activities available to all interested parties and intends to contribute
its results to the appropriate formal standards bodies.
The members of FIPA are individually and
collectively committed to open competition in the development of agent-based
applications, services and equipment. Membership in FIPA is open to any
corporation and individual firm, partnership, governmental body or
international organization without restriction. In particular, members are not
bound to implement or use specific agent-based standards, recommendations and
FIPA specifications by virtue of their participation in FIPA.
The FIPA specifications are developed through
direct involvement of the FIPA membership. The status of a specification can be
either Preliminary, Experimental, Standard, Deprecated or Obsolete. More detail about the process of
specification may be found in the FIPA Procedures for Technical Work. A
complete overview of the FIPA specifications and their current status may be
found in the FIPA List of Specifications. A list of terms and abbreviations
used in the FIPA specifications may be found in the FIPA Glossary.
FIPA is a non-profit association registered in
Geneva, Switzerland. As of January 2000, the 56 members of FIPA represented 17 countries worldwide. Further
information about FIPA as an organization, membership information, FIPA
specifications and upcoming meetings may be found at http://www.fipa.org/.
Contents
This document specifies
the Disconfirm communicative act which is compliant to [FIPA00037]
requirements.
Summary |
The sender informs the receiver that a given proposition is false, where the receiver is known to believe, or believe it likely that, the proposition is true. |
Content |
A proposition. |
Description |
The disconfirm act is used when the agent wishes to alter the known mental attitude of another agent. The sending agent: · believes that some proposition is false, · intends that the receiving agent also comes to believe that the proposition is false, and, · believes that the receiver either believes the proposition, or is uncertain of the proposition. The first two properties defined above are straightforward: the sending agent is sincere, and has (somehow) generated the intention that the receiver should know the proposition (perhaps it has been asked). The last pre-condition determines when the agent should use confirm (see [FIPA00043]), inform (see [FIPA00046]) or disconfirm: disconfirm is used precisely when the other agent is already known to believe the proposition or to be uncertain about it. From the receiver's viewpoint, receiving a disconfirm message entitles it to believe that: · the sender believes that the proposition that is the content of the message is false, and, · the sender wishes the receiver to believe the negated proposition also. Whether or not the receiver does, indeed, change its mental attitude to one of disbelief in the proposition will be a function of the receiver's trust in the sincerity and reliability of the sender. |
Formal
Model |
<i,
disconfirm( j, f )>
FP: BiØf Ù Bi(Ujf Ú Bjf)
RE: BjØf |
Example |
Agent i, believing that agent j thinks that a shark is a mammal, attempts to change j's belief. (disconfirm
(mammal shark)) |
[FIPA00037] FIPA Communicative
Act Library Specification. Foundation for Intelligent
Physical Agents, 2000. http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/
[FIPA00043] FIPA Confirm Communicative Act Specification. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, 2000. http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00043/
[FIPA00046] FIPA Inform Communicative Act Specification. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, 2000. http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00046/